Re: GOOPS-less Shepherd

[Ivan Sokolov]

jbranso@dismail.de writes:

> April 8, 2023 8:54 PM, "Ivan Sokolov" <ivan-p-sokolov@ya.ru> wrote:
>
>> Bodertz <bodertz@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> I don't have strong feelings either way, and the change won't really
>>> affect me too much, but what benefit is there in breaking things? From
>>> what I understand from your message, users' configs will stop working in
>>> a few months when 1.0.x releases (or with the macro would "kinda work"),
>>> which is at least a short-term con, so what's the long-term benefit of
>>> this change? Is GOOPS so bad a thing to require?
>>
>> If I understand correctly, that will allow Shepherd to run on GNU Mes,
>> a Scheme interpreter written for Guix bootstraping.
>
> So by removing the Shepherd's dependency on GNU Mes, the Guix project
> benefits by simplying its bootstrapping process?

Where did this come from?  No, Mes is not a Shepherd's dependency,
please read the quotes again.