[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: hard dependency on Git? (was bug#65866: [PATCH 0/8] Add built-in bui
From: |
Simon Tournier |
Subject: |
Re: hard dependency on Git? (was bug#65866: [PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts) |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:44:17 +0200 |
Hi Vagrant,
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 at 12:35, Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org> wrote:
> What about making git an optional dependency, and only calling out to
> "git gc" if git is available in PATH?
Somehow, that’s more or less the case, IIUC,
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
15 candidates:
./build/android-repo.scm:57: (invoke git-repo-command "init" "-u"
manifest-url "-b" manifest-revision
./build/android-repo.scm:59: (invoke git-repo-command "sync" "-c"
"--fail-fast" "-v" "-j"
./build/git.scm:55: (invoke git-command "init" "--initial-branch=main")
./build/git.scm:56: (invoke git-command "remote" "add" "origin" url)
./build/git.scm:58: (invoke git-command "checkout" "FETCH_HEAD")
./build/git.scm:62: (invoke git-command "fetch" "origin")
./build/git.scm:63: (invoke git-command "checkout" commit)))
./build/git.scm:66: (invoke git-command "submodule" "update" "--init"
"--recursive")
./git-download.scm:175: (invoke "git" "-C" #$output
"init")
./git-download.scm:176: (invoke "git" "-C" #$output
"config" "--local"
./git-download.scm:178: (invoke "git" "-C" #$output
"config" "--local"
./git-download.scm:180: (invoke "git" "-C" #$output
"add" ".")
./git-download.scm:181: (invoke "git" "-C" #$output
"commit" "-am" "init")
./git-download.scm:182: (invoke "git" "-C" #$output
"read-tree" "--empty")
./git-download.scm:183: (invoke "git" "-C" #$output
"reset" "--hard")
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
An “optional dependency”, is it not already the case?
I read hard-dependency as the idea behind a change like [1]. For
instance, something like:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
diff --git a/guix/self.scm b/guix/self.scm
index 81a36e007f..41c5f40786 100644
--- a/guix/self.scm
+++ b/guix/self.scm
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ (define %packages
("gzip" . ,(ref 'compression 'gzip))
("bzip2" . ,(ref 'compression 'bzip2))
("xz" . ,(ref 'compression 'xz))
+ ("git-minimal" . ,(ref 'version-control 'git-minimal))
("po4a" . ,(ref 'gettext 'po4a))
("gettext-minimal" . ,(ref 'gettext 'gettext-minimal))
("gcc-toolchain" . ,(ref 'commencement 'gcc-toolchain))
@@ -825,6 +826,9 @@ (define* (compiled-guix source #:key
(define guile-lzma
(specification->package "guile-lzma"))
+ (define git
+ (specification->package "git-minimal"))
+
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
In the context of the proposal patch#65866 [1], this hard-dependency
makes sense. From my point of view, once we have git-minimal as a
hard-dependency, I do not see the point to keep slower Git operations
using libgit2; as ’commit-relation’ for one example.
But maybe I am missing something.
Cheers,
simon
1: [bug#65866] [PATCH 5/8] build: Add dependency on Git.
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:25:23 +0200
id:4eca94501c2c1e9986e1f718eeccb3eb9276dcd4.1694441831.git.ludo@gnu.org
https://issues.guix.gnu.org//65866
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/4eca94501c2c1e9986e1f718eeccb3eb9276dcd4.1694441831.git.ludo@gnu.org
https://yhetil.org/guix/4eca94501c2c1e9986e1f718eeccb3eb9276dcd4.1694441831.git.ludo@gnu.org
- Re: hard dependency on Git? (was bug#65866: [PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts), (continued)
- Re: hard dependency on Git? (was bug#65866: [PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts), Ludovic Courtès, 2023/09/14
- Re: hard dependency on Git? (was bug#65866: [PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts), Simon Tournier, 2023/09/14
- Re: hard dependency on Git? (was bug#65866: [PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts), Maxim Cournoyer, 2023/09/16
- Re: hard dependency on Git? (was bug#65866: [PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts), Ludovic Courtès, 2023/09/18
- Re: hard dependency on Git? (was bug#65866: [PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts), Simon Tournier, 2023/09/18
- Re: bug#65866: [PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts, Ludovic Courtès, 2023/09/19
- Re: bug#65866: [PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts, Simon Tournier, 2023/09/19
Re: hard dependency on Git? (was bug#65866: [PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts), Vagrant Cascadian, 2023/09/11