[bug#28004] Chromium

[Marius Bakke]

ng0 <address@hidden> writes:

> I think we found it to be good enough to be included in master, or did I miss 
> anything?
>
> Would be nice if I could drop my local patch (and building). The team around 
> Taler seems
> to be interested in it as well as far as I can remember our chats in Leipzig.

Reading up on GNU Taler, Chromium seems like a poor choice for an
anonymous payment system.  Why not GNU IceCat?  I don't see Chromium
becoming stable enough for guaranteed privacy any time soon.  And a full
fork would require a large maintenance team.

Unfortunately I got busy after the latest update, and haven't had time
to work on 65 yet.  I will send an update once I get around to it, and
also try some other Inox patches and see if they help with the "first
launch" issue -- hopefully within a week or two.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature