[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#42339] [PATCH core-updates] gnu: glibc-intermediate: Fixup the pre-

From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: [bug#42339] [PATCH core-updates] gnu: glibc-intermediate: Fixup the pre-configure phase.
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 09:49:17 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)


Jakub Kądziołka <> skribis:

> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:00:22AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Jakub Kądziołka <> skribis:
>> > * gnu/packages/commencement.scm
>> >   (glibc-final-with-bootstrap-bash)[arguments]: Don't patch sunrpc,
>> >   as it's no longer required. Tweak C_INCLUDE_PATH and
>> >   CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH instead of CPATH.


>> > The debug output does not refer to a bootstrap glibc anymore whether the 
>> > phase
>> > is there or not, though it does refer to gcc-cross-boot0:lib. Does this
>> > mean that the phase is simply obsolete, and only the hurd parts should
>> > remain, or is the reference to gcc a bug? Perhaps gcc should have a
>> > separate output for the includes it provides (stdarg and such) so that
>> > this reference doesn't bring in the whole mesboot tree? This would
>> > improve the closure of gcc-toolchain:debug...
>> Oooh, nice.  LGTM!
> Thanks for your review!
>> Please confirm that nothing breaks (everything builds at least up to
>> ‘gcc-final’) and you can push to ‘core-updates’.
> I have confirmed that hello builds both natively and cross-built. On a
> similar topic, the same test succeeded for removing the native-gcc input.
> As the comment suggests, it was only being used for --enable-obsolete-rpc.
> I am thus considering a v2 that also removes said input. Does that make
> sense?

Yes it does (again provided nothing breaks).

Thank you!


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]