[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#43699] [PATCH] guix: Fix argument order of fxbit-set?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
[bug#43699] [PATCH] guix: Fix argument order of fxbit-set? |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Sep 2020 11:34:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Lars-Dominik Braun <ldb@leibniz-psychology.org> skribis:
>> The root problem is that the ‘fxbit-set?’ alias defined at the top of
>> openpgp.scm had the arguments swapped compared to ‘bit-set?’. So I
>> changed that alias instead of changing its users (‘fxbit-set?’ is
>> defined in R6RS).
> oh, okay. I looked at SRFI 143 which also has a fxbit-set? with the same
> argument order as bit-set?, so I thought the alias was mimicking that API. But
> this works too I guess.
Oh, didn’t know about that SRFI; that’s the beauty of Scheme: 10
“standard” interfaces for the same thing. :-)
This OpenPGP code originates from R6RS (Göran Weinholt’s Industria
library and related code) so I think that was right.
Thanks,
Ludo’.