[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Getting started with GWL 0.3.0
From: |
Konrad Hinsen |
Subject: |
Re: Getting started with GWL 0.3.0 |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:04:37 +0100 |
Hi Simon,
> The plan of the documentation is discussed here:
>
> <https://yhetil.org/guix/86k0sekkj8.fsf@gmail.com>
Looks like I missed a discussion on guix-devel. My excuse is that I
can't keep up with guix-devel any more, it's getting too much!
> This is really cool because “guix repl -- foo.scm arg1 arg2” can now be
> really handy with “guix foo arg1 arg2”.
Handy, yes. But is it a good idea from a security point of view? As a
Guix user, I trust "guix" with all its subcommands because I know that
all the code is carefully inspected by several competent developers. I
don't have the same level of trust in software packaged within Guix.
I'd rather see packages building on "guix" but provide their own
top-level scripts with distinct names. And support for writing such
packages in making it easier to access the user's default Guix profile.
> Well, about this GUIX_EXTENSIONS_PATHS, as the author of “guix repl --”
> your feedback is very welcome. :-)
See above :-)
Cheers,
Konrad.
- Getting started with GWL 0.3.0, Konrad Hinsen, 2021/03/22
- Re: Getting started with GWL 0.3.0, zimoun, 2021/03/22
- Re: Getting started with GWL 0.3.0,
Konrad Hinsen <=
- Re: Getting started with GWL 0.3.0, zimoun, 2021/03/22
- Re: Getting started with GWL 0.3.0, Konrad Hinsen, 2021/03/22
- Re: Getting started with GWL 0.3.0, zimoun, 2021/03/22
- Re: Getting started with GWL 0.3.0, Konrad Hinsen, 2021/03/23
- Re: Getting started with GWL 0.3.0, Ricardo Wurmus, 2021/03/23
- Re: Getting started with GWL 0.3.0, Roel Janssen, 2021/03/23
- Re: Getting started with GWL 0.3.0, zimoun, 2021/03/23
- Re: Getting started with GWL 0.3.0, Konrad Hinsen, 2021/03/24
- Re: Getting started with GWL 0.3.0, zimoun, 2021/03/24
Re: Getting started with GWL 0.3.0, Konrad Hinsen, 2021/03/23