gzz-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex


From: Janne V. Kujala
Subject: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/Paper paper.tex
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 03:16:46 -0400

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Changes by:     Janne V. Kujala <address@hidden>        03/05/05 03:16:46

Modified files:
        Paper          : paper.tex 

Log message:
        shorten; fix table formatting

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex.diff?tr1=1.151&tr2=1.152&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex
diff -u manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.151 manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.152
--- manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex:1.151   Sun May  4 18:24:53 2003
+++ manuscripts/Paper/paper.tex Mon May  5 03:16:46 2003
@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@
 %for linear (XXX: usually around gamma 2) RGB reproduction.
 For each background,
 we use colors from {\em both} the dark and light end of the 
-80-100 range in order to create some contrast.
+80--100 range in order to create some contrast.
 This makes the shapes in the texture apparent, 
 and avoids the unpleasant, blurry appearance of images with only 
 chroma changes in colors. 
@@ -1472,18 +1472,6 @@
 \subsubsection{Results}
 
 \begin{table}
-\def\numres#1#2{#1 (#2s)}%
-\begin{center}
-\begin{tabular}{l|cc|cc}
-      & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{\sc textures}  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\sc colors} \\
-      & correct  & incorrect & correct & incorrect \\
-\hline
-seen   & \numres{72}{2.6} & \numres{28}{5.5} & \numres{71}{2.8} & 
\numres{29}{4.1} \\
-not seen   & \numres{84}{3.0} & \numres{16}{5.6} & \numres{43}{3.4} & 
\numres{57}{4.0} \\
-\hline
-total & \numres{78}{2.8} & \numres{22}{5.5} & \numres{57}{3.1} & 
\numres{43}{4.1}
-\end{tabular}
-\end{center}
 \caption{
 \label{tableresults}
 Results of a recognition experiment with 15 previously seen
@@ -1496,6 +1484,18 @@
 one
 previous viewing.
 }
+\def\numres#1#2{#1 (#2s)}%
+\begin{center}
address@hidden|address@hidden|address@hidden@{\hspace{4pt}}}
+      & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{\sc textures}  & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\sc colors} \\
+      & correct  & incorrect & correct & incorrect \\
+\hline
+seen   & \numres{72}{2.6} & \numres{28}{5.5} & \numres{71}{2.8} & 
\numres{29}{4.1} \\
+not seen   & \numres{84}{3.0} & \numres{16}{5.6} & \numres{43}{3.4} & 
\numres{57}{4.0} \\
+\hline
+total & \numres{78}{2.8} & \numres{22}{5.5} & \numres{57}{3.1} & 
\numres{43}{4.1}
+\end{tabular}
+\end{center}
 \end{table}
 
 %80, 53 fail to bring out the results correctly. Should
@@ -1503,7 +1503,9 @@
 %was basically guessing!!!
 
 The results are summarized in Table~\ref{tableresults}.
-A repeated measures analysis of variance indicates that
+%A repeated measures 
+An
+analysis of variance indicates that
 the average recognition performance is significantly better
 for the textures than for the solid colors [F(1,4) = 19.0, p = .012].
 %The recognition of solid colors was only almost statistically significantly 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]