[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gzz] Re: 5th
From: |
Janne Kujala |
Subject: |
[Gzz] Re: 5th |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Jul 2002 16:54:47 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 03:40:07PM +0300, Tuomas Lukka wrote:
> > writing briefly
> >
> > shared_ptr<Obj> p;
> > p = new Obj;
>
> Does it get the refcount right then?
It seems so. But it also seems that the above code
does not compile with gcc 3.0, which makes sense
as there seems to be no implemenation for such an operator
in the library. I wonder how 2.95 managed to compile the code.
> mind that. What other problems were there with 3.0?
The only real (i.e., not related to namespace differences or other
files being compiled with 2.95) problem was vector<T>::iterator
not being automatically convertible to T*.
Now, I use &vec[0] insted of vec.begin() in GL calls, which should
work ok if stl::vector is guaranteed to wrap a continuous array.
jvk
- [Gzz] Re: 2nd, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/07/02
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [Gzz] Re: 5th, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/07/08
- [Gzz] Re: 5th, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 2002/07/08
Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [Gzz] Re: 5th, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/07/08
- [Gzz] Re: 5th,
Janne Kujala <=