[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gzz] Is xupdf reasonable?!
From: |
Matti Katila |
Subject: |
[Gzz] Is xupdf reasonable?! |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jan 2003 10:02:25 +0200 (EET) |
[The subject was only considerer to wake you up ;) ]
Subject: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/xupdf article.rst
Module name: manuscripts
Changes by: Janne V. Kujala <address@hidden> 03/01/27 02:25:19
Log message: link direction/type issue
diff -u manuscripts/xupdf/article.rst:1.25
@@ -57,6 +57,12 @@
It could be argued that more variation in the directions would
yield more visual features for distinguishing between different links.
+- Do we differentiate between different link types/directions such as
+ - left-right
+ - past-future
+ - source-referer
+ - created by document author/user?
Well, Janne noticed that there's a lot of things influenced to
bidirectional links and left/rigth direction.
Basically xupdf is pdf viewer and what we have? Only UI with links.
Even bib entrys have more information than xupdf has in links.
There isn't way to tell to user: "Mmmkay, this is referred from this
article". We can only say that there exist a link between articles.
OTOH, we can not say that article refers to another or have we made the
link ourselfs.
This mail's purpose was to raise conversation about xupdf and the issues
involved to it.
-Matti
- [Gzz] Is xupdf reasonable?!,
Matti Katila <=
- [Gzz] Re: Is xupdf reasonable?!, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/01/27
- Re: [Gzz] Re: Is xupdf reasonable?!, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/01/27
- Re: [Gzz] Re: Is xupdf reasonable?!, Matti Katila, 2003/01/27
- Re: [Gzz] Re: Is xupdf reasonable?!, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/01/27
- Re: [Gzz] Re: Is xupdf reasonable?!, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/01/27
- Re: [Gzz] Re: Is xupdf reasonable?!, Matti Katila, 2003/01/28
- Re: [Gzz] Re: Is xupdf reasonable?!, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/01/29
- Re: [Gzz] Re: Is xupdf reasonable?!, Asko Soukka, 2003/01/27
- Re: [Gzz] Re: Is xupdf reasonable?!, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/01/27
- Re: [Gzz] Re: Is xupdf reasonable?!, Asko Soukka, 2003/01/27