|
From: | Benja Fallenstein |
Subject: | Re: [Gzz] Re: Is xupdf reasonable?! |
Date: | Mon, 27 Jan 2003 17:39:34 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021226 Debian/1.2.1-9 |
Tuomas Lukka wrote:
A Lego brick does not usually have a "meaning", but its meaning is determined by the context. That's the idea here, too: *we* don't say how you should use these but just give power. Forcing the user to choose link styles, colors etc. always from a semantic list would be taking power away, IMHO. Now, allowing the user to write, *if she wants*, text on the link or so, would be good.
Writing on a link is something I'd like, but I think it *may* be orthogonal to link types... not sure.
If we have link types, there must be a default, 'untyped' type of link of course.
-b.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |