heartlogic-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Heartlogic-dev] comments on story rating thing


From: Joshua N Pritikin
Subject: Re: [Heartlogic-dev] comments on story rating thing
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 22:20:36 +0530

On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 19:49 -0500, William L. Jarrold wrote:
> On Fri, 13 May 2005, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
> it might be a teency bit better if you do it on several lines.
> 
> e.g. insteaed of...
> 
> You judged this statement as highly believable. We have collected 3 
> ratings so far (including yours). The average believability rating is 
> 0.67 on a scale of -1.0 (highly unbelievable) to 1.0 (highly believable). 
> The standard deviation is 0.58.
> 
> ...can you format  it as..
> 
> You judged this statement as highly believable. 
> We have collected 3 ratings so far (including yours). 
> The average believability rating is 4.67 on a scale of 1 (highly 
> unbelievable) to 5 (highly believable).

Changed.

> > >>   second,
> >> do it however we do it for "Vienna is wet." and friends (i.e. the
> >> rumination story).
> >
> > OK, maybe, but I want to let them diverge for a while.  It's more
> > creative.  ;-)
> 
> yarhg.  whatever.  let's keep going...BUT, maybe we agree to the
> following principle: we can ask our study-ignorant friends to look at
> it and ask them to imagine doing it the other way.  and then say,
> "which way would you prefer."
> 
> i mean to apply this principle to any thing on which we disagree.

OK

> >> ...ALSO THIS SEEMS LIKE AN IMPORTANT SUGGESTIONS this kinda makes more
> >> sense if the participant saw them grouped meaningfully.  E.g. like
> >> so...
> >>
> >>    Jill is indifferent about a pale of water for herself.  1 2 3 4 5
> >>    Jack is indifferent about a pale of water for herself.  1 2 3 4 5
> >>    Jill thinks that Jack is indifferent about a pale of water for herself. 
> >> 1 2 3 4 5
> >>    Jack thinks that Jill is indifferent about a pale of water for herself. 
> >> 1 2 3 4 5
> >>
> >> ....Whuddyasay to that?

I say I'm going to try it.  Give me a day to beat the code into
shape.  ;-)

> Nice.  I just verified this.  But can you make it say
> "Any comments?" instead of "Any comments:"

Changed.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]