[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?
From: |
Björn Lindström |
Subject: |
Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken? |
Date: |
08 May 2003 23:55:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
Barry Margolin <barry.margolin@level3.com> writes:
> It seems like bad practice to direct followups to a group not in the
> original list. The replies will show up there, but the original message to
> which they refer will not, so the readers of that group will find it
> confusing.
That's right. The Follow-up header is meant to point out which one of
the crossposted groups is appropriate to reply to. If you use it to move
a discussion from one group to the other you should certainly post the
message to it as well.
--
Björn Lindström <bkhl@privat.utfors.se>
Home page -> http://hem.fyristorg.com/bkhl/
Blog -> http://bkhl.livejournal.com/
Elektrubadur demo -> http://hem.fyristorg.com/bkhl/elektrubadur/
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, (continued)
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/05/07
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, Phillip Lord, 2003/05/07
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, Oliver Scholz, 2003/05/07
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, BK, 2003/05/07
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, Oliver Scholz, 2003/05/08
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, Barry Margolin, 2003/05/08
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?,
Björn Lindström <=
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, BK, 2003/05/07
Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, niels freimann, 2003/05/07
Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, David Kastrup, 2003/05/07
Re: Is Emacs on Aqua crippleware or is it just broken?, BK, 2003/05/07