[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: EmacsW32 invocation options

From: Juanma Barranquero
Subject: Re: EmacsW32 invocation options
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 17:37:32 +0200

On 5/2/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) <address@hidden> wrote:

It is more that the feedback at that time had to be on a more detailed
level to be meaningful, at least for me.

I don't know whether you're joking. I was simplifying. There was
detailed criticism as well as lighter one.

What I meant was that I perhaps could have added
something to your view if you had tried to be more concrete at that
time. (I am not sure I remember the details any more.)

It could have added something to your view if you had tried to accept
that some of us thought there was no time to do a proper design (much
smaller features fell off the wayside because of the "freeze"). You
didn't seem to keen on waiting.

That is ok, but it is not my responsibility.

No, but you *are* responsible of quite aggressively promoting a
distribution that takes pride in doing some things different from the
standard one (all these things that you affirm that "do not work" or
"are very difficult" in Windows and that you've "fixed" with your
ad-hoc solutions).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]