[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: basic question: going back to dired

From: Lennart Borgman (gmail)
Subject: Re: basic question: going back to dired
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:41:19 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv: Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/ Mnenhy/

Nikolaj Schumacher wrote:
"Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden> wrote:

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:38, Juanma <address@hidden> wrote:

On the other hand, selection with shift+arrows seems to me like the crappy
stuff I used to do before entering the glory of Emacs. I would go to admit
it's a small plus to be able to *also* do it like that, but I think setting
the mark, as an anchor, and extend as you move with any other movement
command (and that includes, e.g., i-search), is vastly superior.
We'll have to agree to disagree. I have almost no use for invisible
regions that extend with movement commands.

Except for the default on the visible part, there's actually little
difference between the two methods.  i-search seems to work in cua-mode,
as well.  The only difference is, really, that you either hold shift all
the way through, or hit a key once.  I feel the second method is more
comfortable for a touch-typist, but I don't think CUA users are missing
anything here.

Both methods are available when you use cua-mode.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]