[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: migrating from ido to icicles
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: migrating from ido to icicles |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:31:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) |
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
> Long ago Icicles used TAB and S-TAB only for completion, not also for
> cycling as now. If there were a demand for this it could be optional,
> but today it is not.
I agree something like the proposed behavior would be handy. I think I
would like it, too.
> If you want that behavior, replace
> `icicle-next-(prefix|apropos)-complete-cycles-p' with `nil' wherever its
> value is used in `icicles-mcmd.el'. (You still do have other keys that
> perform only cycling.)
If it is that easy, why don't we do this in the code and make the
behavior optional?
Regards,
Michael.