[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process inste
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP) |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Jul 2013 06:32:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org> writes:
> There are two ways to build threads: by reference and by same
> subjects. Gathering by subjects is the default in Gnus
> nowadays.
So you get them the wrong way, because you sort by reference? And
I still get them correct. I see. *Still*, I like the reference
stuff to work.
> Hm, not sure what might be the culprit. But what is
> `new-message' good for, i.e., what does it do that C-x m
> (`compose-mail') with `mail-user-agent' set to `gnus-user-agent'
> wouldn't also do?
I set that up to have a common interface for rmail and Gnus, for
sending messages. It might be better your way - I will try that,
now.
--
Emanuel Berg - programmer (hire me! CV below)
computer projects: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
internet activity: http://home.student.uu.se/embe8573
- Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP, (continued)
- Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP, Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/15
- Message not available
- [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/15
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/16
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/16
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/16
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/17
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/19
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/19
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP),
Emanuel Berg <=
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/20
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/22
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/22
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/23
Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP, Barry Margolin, 2013/07/09