[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process inste
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP) |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:31:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> writes:
> And... *drumroll* now it works?
In the post you posted, the one I replied to, it looked like this:
Message-ID: mailman.1423.1374252559.12400.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
In my reply, this seems to be correctly referenced last in the
header
References: ... mailman.1423.1374252559.12400.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
However, when you said that my Gnus was broke, it didn't look like
that to begin with, but like this:
87sizfgd3l.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de
I don't know, this may have something to do with the dual nature
(newsgroup/mailing list) of GEH.
I commented out these lines -
;; (insert "\nTo: ")
;; (transpose-lines 1)
;; (set-buffer-modified-p nil)
;; (goto-char 1)
;; (end-of-line) )
- from my `new-message' (pasted earlier). I don't know what, but
thing changed *something*, because now when I mail *and* send a
message to a newsgroup, the mail contains the following inserted
message:
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to alt.test as well.
First, I thought Gnus added this when used to send mail, but I
tried it with both below configurations -
;; (setq mail-user-agent 'gnus-user-agent)
(setq mail-user-agent 'message-user-agent)
- and got the same message. And, this message did *not* appear
with the five commented lines above active.
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/16
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/16
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/17
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/19
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/19
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/19
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/20
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/20
- Message not available
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Emanuel Berg, 2013/07/22
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP),
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: [OT, meta] markup (Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP), Tassilo Horn, 2013/07/23
Re: have emacs use SIGTERM to end a process instead of SIGHUP, Barry Margolin, 2013/07/09