[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Nov 2013 20:55:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:
> A good way to think would be to "segment" the users.
>
> If one just puts a starting init file for each of the
> "segment" in GNU ELPA, then this file and library
> itself will become a focal point for consensus
> building. In a word, the .el file becomes a
> "clearing house" for common or recommended
> configuration.
...although I understand it now, I still don't like
it. It is something "Asperger
syndrome"/schoolboyishness about that whole line of
thinking.
If we have a tool that can do a hundred things, why
market it as "you should use this suite, if you want to
do [a subset] 10 things?" Does that really make sense?
--
Emanuel Berg, programmer-for-rent. CV, projects, etc at uXu
underground experts united: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, (continued)
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/29
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/30
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/30
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/30
- Message not available
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/30
- Message not available
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/30
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/30
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Yuri Khan, 2013/11/29
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/29
- Message not available
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/29
- Message not available
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Rustom Mody, 2013/11/29
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/29