[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Rmail: 'reply' vs 'reply-all'?
From: |
Christopher Pinon |
Subject: |
Rmail: 'reply' vs 'reply-all'? |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Feb 2017 13:05:40 +0100 |
I'm familiar with Emacs (using version 25.1), but new to Rmail, which
I've been testing. My quick question is: is there a simple key
distinction between 'reply' and 'reply-all' in Rmail?
In more detail, the Emacs manual, specifically,
https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Rmail-Reply.html
suggests (on my reading) that typing 'r' will add the 'CC' field to the
header if the incoming message contains recipients in this field. In
contrast, typing 'C-u r' will omit the 'CC' field entirely.
Unfortunately, in my testing, typing 'r' (like 'C-u r') omits the 'CC'
field when the incoming message contains recipients in this field, and I
have to add this field manually if I want to have it.
Am I missing something obvious? (My customizations are minimal and don't
concern 'reply' in Rmail.) Any advice would be appreciated.
Thank you,
C.
- Rmail: 'reply' vs 'reply-all'?,
Christopher Pinon <=
- Re: Rmail: 'reply' vs 'reply-all'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/01
- Re: Rmail: 'reply' vs 'reply-all'?, Christopher Pinon, 2017/02/01
- Re: Rmail: 'reply' vs 'reply-all'?, Christopher Pinon, 2017/02/02
- Re: Rmail: 'reply' vs 'reply-all'?, Christopher Pinon, 2017/02/03
- Re: Rmail: 'reply' vs 'reply-all'?, Robert Thorpe, 2017/02/04
- Re: Rmail: 'reply' vs 'reply-all'?, Christopher Pinon, 2017/02/06
- Re: Rmail: 'reply' vs 'reply-all'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/07
- Re: Rmail: 'reply' vs 'reply-all'?, Glenn Morris, 2017/02/07
- Re: Rmail: 'reply' vs 'reply-all'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/07
- Re: Rmail: 'reply' vs 'reply-all'?, Christopher Pinon, 2017/02/07