[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (*) -> 1
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: (*) -> 1 |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jan 2023 19:46:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> writes:
> > I OTOH have no garage. The number of my Ferraris in all my garages is
> > (+) -> 0 Ferraries.
>
> Don't add Ferraris, just multiply them and you will get one.
Note that when (+ 2 3) would yield 7 in Elisp, I would accept your "it's
wrong" because there is a valid interpretation using Ferraris: (+ 2 3)
should return the number of Ferraris of two sets of two and three
Ferraris, and these are five Ferraris.
But what calculation involving Ferraris would (*) correspond to? I
don't see any interpretation of the formula that would apply to
Ferraris, so it's not valid to say that a result of "one Ferrari" is
wrong. What should that have calculated?
Michael.
- Re: [External] : Re: How to make M-x TAB not work on (interactive) declaration?, (continued)
- Re: [External] : Re: How to make M-x TAB not work on (interactive) declaration?, Jean Louis, 2023/01/16
- Re: [External] : Re: How to make M-x TAB not work on (interactive) declaration?, Eduardo Ochs, 2023/01/16
- (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/17
- Re: (*) -> 1, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/01/17
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/17
- Re: (*) -> 1, tomas, 2023/01/17
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/17
- Re: (*) -> 1, Nick Dokos, 2023/01/17
- Re: (*) -> 1, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/01/17
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/17
- Re: (*) -> 1,
Michael Heerdegen <=
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/17
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/17
- Re: (*) -> 1, Eduardo Ochs, 2023/01/17
- Re: (*) -> 1, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/01/17
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/18
- Re: (*) -> 1, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/01/18
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/19
- Re: (*) -> 1, Tassilo Horn, 2023/01/19
- Re: (*) -> 1, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/01/19
- Re: (*) -> 1, Jean Louis, 2023/01/19