[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: cost of -MP

From: Boris Kolpackov
Subject: Re: cost of -MP
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 10:20:07 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

Noel Yap <address@hidden> writes:

> Sorry for the confusion and for inadvertently implying you were stupid.

I was just joking ;-)

> Currently, are the dependencies files regenerated due to a "-include", or 
> as part of the object file being built?

The latter.

> When you say "re-exec", do you mean a re-exec due to an included makefile 
> being rebuilt?  Or due to make recursively calling itself?

The latter again. All those re-execs are done explicitly via "make -C ...".

> Can you elaborate on what you mean by "up-to-date build" below?

It means that everything is up-to-date. When you run make on such a build
no files change and make happily says that nothing needs to be done. That's
what you usually get when you run make second time on the same build.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]