[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: calling octave from C
From: |
Judd Storrs |
Subject: |
Re: calling octave from C |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:36:23 -0500 |
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Judd Storrs <address@hidden> wrote:
>> How can forbidding non-GPL python files be justified while
>> simultaneously allowing use of non-GPL m-files? How does the GPL
>> choose to favor one interpreted language over another?
>
> It doesn't. It's using the bindings that make the difference. At least FSF
> thinks so.
Doesn't any m-file executed through pytave uses the same bindings?
--judd
- Re: Pytave licensing, (continued)
- Re: Pytave licensing, David Grundberg, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/19
- Re: Pytave licensing, David Grundberg, 2009/11/20
- Re: Pytave licensing, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/20
- Re: Pytave licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/20
- Re: Pytave licensing (was: Re: calling octave from C), Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/19
- Re: calling octave from C, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/19
- Re: calling octave from C, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/19
- Re: calling octave from C, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/20
- Re: calling octave from C,
Judd Storrs <=
- Re: calling octave from C, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/20
- Re: calling octave from C, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/20
- Re: calling octave from C, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/21
- Re: calling octave from C, David Grundberg, 2009/11/21
- Re: calling octave from C, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/21
- Re: calling octave from C, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/21
- Re: calling octave from C, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/21
- Re: calling octave from C, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/22
- Re: calling octave from C, Judd Storrs, 2009/11/22
- Re: calling octave from C, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/22