[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH]Remove security framework

From: Gwenaël Casaccio
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] [PATCH]Remove security framework
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:55:09 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2

On 13/01/2013 13:19, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 12:34:26PM +0100, Gwenaël Casaccio wrote:


And as Paolo says it was never really used.
well, that is a good reason. There is no reason to have a half done
security framework.

-  p.untrustedContext = IS_OOP_UNTRUSTED (_gst_this_context_oop);
+  p.untrustedContext = false;
What is the reason to leave the untrustedContext around?
Thanks I will remove it
thanks. What would be very nice is to have something like sunspider for
GST. A set of tests/examples that we want to optimize for (because I am
biased it would be the GSM parsing and formating code I have) and run
the benchmark after any libgst/ and kernel/ change.


help-smalltalk mailing list

Here is a new version


Attachment: remove_security.patch
Description: Text Data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]