Re: proxy memory objects

[Thomas Bushnell, BSG]

Marcus Brinkmann <address@hidden> writes:

> However, I think I will change the function name of the hack to
> mach_create_memory_object_proxy, to illustrate the target of the RPC better
> and leave the memory_object_* name space to the memory object (and control)
> interface.

Yes, I think this is the right strategy.  So we need two additional
interfaces, one called mach_create_memory_object_proxy, and one called
memory_object_create_proxy.