[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?
From: |
Frank Fredstone |
Subject: |
Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13? |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:52:02 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:10:50 -0800, Kendall wrote:
>
>> (setq gnus-secondary-select-methods
>> '((nnml "mail")
>
> What happens if you remove the nnml definition?
My IMAP inbox ends up empty. In the group buffer, nnimap+asdf:INBOX is
shown to have messages. But when I select it (gnus-topic-select-group
t), it says there are no messages. The messages appear in one of the
Incoming... files.
> Or if you set the "nnml-get-new-mail" setting to nil for the nnml
> backend?
It is already set that way.
> [...]
>> and mail-sources is nil
>
> Hm, I thought that would govern it. I.e. the node "Fetching Mail" in the
> manual says:
>
> "If this variable is `nil', the mail back ends will never attempt to
> fetch mail by themselves."
>
> Did you configure imap-splitting?
No. I used to have nnmail-split-methods set, but have unset it and get
the same results.
- Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/05
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/05
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/05
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/05
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/05
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/06
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/06
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Kendall Shaw, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?,
Frank Fredstone <=
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/08