[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?
From: |
Frank Fredstone |
Subject: |
Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13? |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:16:05 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
> On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:13:13 -0800, Frank wrote:
>
>> asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
>
>>>>> Or if you set the "nnml-get-new-mail" setting to nil for the nnml
>>>>> backend?
>
> [...]
>
>> (setq gnus-secondary-select-methods
>> '((nnml "mail"
>> (nnmail-get-new-mail nil))
>
> Uhm, why do you write "nnmail-"? It should be "nnml-" :-)
D'oh. Okay, I've tried changing that to nnml-get-new-mail, but I get
the same result.
>> (nnimap "pokey"
>> (nnimap-address "localhost")
>> (nnimap-server-port 143)
>> (nnimap-stream network))))
>
>> The result is that my IMAP inbox is emptied, and the contents is not
>> moved to the nnml inbox.
>
> I still think that it is very weird if you have set mail-sources to nil
> and you haven't configured nnimap splitting.
My reasoning is that I have mail split using my imap server's sieve
functionality. And, I use multiple email clients from multiple
computers. I want gnus to do no splitting.
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, (continued)
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/05
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/06
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/06
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Kendall Shaw, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?,
Frank Fredstone <=
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/07
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/08
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Frank Fredstone, 2010/01/09
- Re: Change in splitting from emacs 22/gnus 5.11 and emacs 23/gnus 5.13?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/01/08