[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Deficient thread sorting in summary view
From: |
F . Durand |
Subject: |
Deficient thread sorting in summary view |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:05:11 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Hello all,
I've switched to gnus 3 months ago, and I'm very disturbed by the way
threads are sorted.
I've read this many times: http://gnus.org/manual/gnus_91.html
I've concluded that the state of a thread is the state of its first message.
Thus, if you have an old thread with a new message, you won't remark it.
Freshly harvested messages should be highlighted. Actually, they are
highlighted, with a leading dot ("."). Except if the message belongs
to a thread that is still displayed (because one of its messages has
been pinned or is still unread). In such case, the thread will be
displayed at the place of the old message (i.e. far in the past) without
the freshness mark (".").
In my case, either I miss some messages or, if I knew how many fresh mails
were waiting for me thanks to another program, I loose some time looking
for my invisible fresh mails, fail to spot them, and decide to switch to
unthreaded view (M-C-t) where articles are sorted correctly.
Any idea ?
- Deficient thread sorting in summary view,
F . Durand <=
- Re: Deficient thread sorting in summary view, Tassilo Horn, 2012/07/11
- Re: Deficient thread sorting in summary view, Eric Abrahamsen, 2012/07/11
- Re: Deficient thread sorting in summary view, Tassilo Horn, 2012/07/11
- Re: Deficient thread sorting in summary view, Eric Abrahamsen, 2012/07/11
- Re: Deficient thread sorting in summary view, Tassilo Horn, 2012/07/11
- Re: Deficient thread sorting in summary view, Eric Abrahamsen, 2012/07/11
- Re: Deficient thread sorting in summary view, Tassilo Horn, 2012/07/12
- Re: Deficient thread sorting in summary view, Eric Abrahamsen, 2012/07/12
- Re: Deficient thread sorting in summary view, Tassilo Horn, 2012/07/12
- Re: Deficient thread sorting in summary view, Eric Abrahamsen, 2012/07/13