[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another question about self-paging
From: |
Paavo Parkkinen |
Subject: |
Re: Another question about self-paging |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:28:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Sun, 30.10.2005 at 16:45 -0500, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> No, except in the sense that you can look at all of the existing
> publications on market-based scheduling and the like, and after a while
> you will conclude that none of them really solve the problem. The
> underlying issue is that the resources are not infinitely subdivisible,
> so the market structure does not exhibit continuously differential
> pricing, and at a certain low point items fall out of sponsorship in
> ways that the individual players are unable to predict.
I don't think I completely understand what you are saying. Could you
explain this a bit more?
Paavo
--
kremlin kanavien soppaa
Re: Another question about self-paging, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/30
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/30
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Paavo Parkkinen, 2005/10/31
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/31
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Paavo Parkkinen, 2005/10/31
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/31
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Paavo Parkkinen, 2005/10/31
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/31
Re: Another question about self-paging, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/31