[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another question about self-paging
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: Another question about self-paging |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:31:47 -0500 |
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 18:23 +0200, Paavo Parkkinen wrote:
> On Mon, 31.10.2005 at 17:14 +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> > Process B can influence the state of the system and thus ensure that A gets
> > notified. If A and B cooperate, they can use this as a communication
> > channel.
>
> Ah, ok. I didn't realize that communication between cooperating
> processes is also forbidden.
These processes are NOT cooperating within the sense of the security
policy. Imagine that A is a Trojan horse and B is a retransmission agent
that is outside of some security perimeter.
shap
- Re: Another question about self-paging, (continued)
Re: Another question about self-paging, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/30
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/30
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Paavo Parkkinen, 2005/10/31
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/31
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Paavo Parkkinen, 2005/10/31
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/31
- Re: Another question about self-paging, Paavo Parkkinen, 2005/10/31
- Re: Another question about self-paging,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
Re: Another question about self-paging, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/31