[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: for the "love of HURD"
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: for the "love of HURD" |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:54:16 -0500 |
On Fri, 2006-11-10 at 19:35 +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> The Hurd does not belong to the FSF in anyway. The FSF might be the
> copyright holders, but they are not the owners of the Hurd. Anyone
> can take the Hurd and make a fork of it, and many users have their own
> private versions of the Hurd with their local hacks.
Alfred: the copyright holder is, in law the holder of rights in the
work. Legally, they are the owner. I was not making a negative statement
about the community or the way it operates. I was making a statement
about the legal status of ownership (technically: rights-holdership) of
the work of collective authorship that constitutes the Hurd code.
shap
- for the "love of HURD", arnuld, 2006/11/10
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Richard Braun, 2006/11/10
- Re: for the "love of HURD", arnuld, 2006/11/10
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Pierre THIERRY, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Pierre THIERRY, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Daniel Martin, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Pierre THIERRY, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Daniel Martin, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Daniel Martin, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/13
- Re: for the "love of HURD", Leonardo Pereira, 2006/11/13