[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Design principles
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: Design principles |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:27:39 -0500 |
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 18:26 +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Well, in this case I have the upper hand in the discussion, because we
> definitely have exciting and convincing evidence that mutually
> suspicious collaboration can and will happen in transparent computer
> systems. As a primary example, I cite Wikipedia, which has strong
> security without opaqueness. (If you want an example at the operating
> system level, I cite the Incompatible Timesharing System, ITS,
> although that is less convincing because it comes from a time where
> the computing environment was quite different. Still the similarities
> to Wikipedia's security mechanisms are all too obvious, so it has to
> be mentioned).
An interesting assertion. What are Wikipedia's security mechanisms?
--
Jonathan S. Shapiro, Ph.D.
Managing Director
The EROS Group, LLC
+1 443 927 1719 x5100
- Design principles, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/01/14
- Re: Design principles, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2007/01/14
- Re: Design principles, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/01/14
- Re: Design principles, Marcus Brinkmann, 2007/01/15
- Re: Design principles, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2007/01/15
- Re: Design principles, Marcus Brinkmann, 2007/01/15
- Re: Design principles,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: Design principles, Marcus Brinkmann, 2007/01/15
- Re: Design principles, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2007/01/15
- Re: Design principles, Neal H. Walfield, 2007/01/15
- Re: Design principles, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2007/01/15
- Re: Design principles, Marcus Brinkmann, 2007/01/15
- Re: Design principles, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2007/01/15
- Re: Design principles, Sam Mason, 2007/01/15
- Re: Design principles, Neal H. Walfield, 2007/01/15
- Re: Design principles, Sam Mason, 2007/01/15
- Re: Design principles, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/01/16