[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Libcdio-devel] [RFC] Alternative proposals: pragmatic-multiextent t

From: Pete Batard
Subject: Re: [Libcdio-devel] [RFC] Alternative proposals: pragmatic-multiextent ts-multiextent
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:09:59 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1

Hi Thomas,

On 2018.07.14 11:42, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
i have (for now) completed the branches




Pete, may i ask you to test pragmatic-multiextent in your programs
and with your ISO collection ?

For varied reasons, it may be a couple of weeks before I can modify my application to try to use the pragmatic-multiextent API. But I'll try to do that when I get a chance.

I can however indicate that, while pragmatic-multiextent compiles fine with MinGW-w32 on Windows, the test suite fails for testisorr.exe with the following testisorr.log.

-- Good! Did not find Rock Ridge in D:/libcdio/test/data/copying.iso
-- Should have found Rock Ridge for D:/libcdio/test/data/copying-rr.iso
FAIL testisorr.exe (exit status: 2)

Same also appears to occur for me when testing on Linux...

I haven't tested the latest ts-multiextent. I may do that for MinGW, but only if this is the branch that's going to be merged into mainline (a move that, if it needs to be reminded, I would vote firmly against).



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]