[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Liberty-eiffel] Closures

From: Raphael Mack
Subject: Re: [Liberty-eiffel] Closures
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:32:44 +0100


oh Cyril, you're so great!

In the wiki you wrote:
"access is read-only: you cannot assign to an outside local variable
(and, of course, to an argument, but that's standard Eiffel anyway)"

What is the rational for this? - I like the rule, but when we have it,
wouldn't it be inline to also forbid feature calls with (observable)
side effect on the outer variables? - Yes, we do not have a concept of
"pure" features in Liberty, but may be we would like to have it once? Or


On Di, 2013-11-19 at 15:59 +0100, Cyril ADRIAN wrote:
> All,
> I started Bell implementations, esp. inline agents as closures.
> Of course, the work is only begun. It currently lies only in my public
> Github repo and is not pushed in Savannah yet.
> I also added a little explanation of what I intend to do in the wiki.
> See:
> Feel free to comment.
> Cheers,
> Cyril ADRIAN (from office)
> To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider whether
> defending the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign or
> domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. 
> Google+ Posts
> My latest G+: Liberty Eiffel
> adler-rc1 is out! 
> My G+ - Posts - Add to Circles -
> 21:01 Nov-05
>   Get this email app!  
> Get a signature like this. CLICK HERE.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]