[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libmicrohttpd] [GSoC Update] Week 1

From: Didik Setiawan
Subject: Re: [libmicrohttpd] [GSoC Update] Week 1
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 00:40:56 +0700
User-agent: Zoho Mail

On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 23:51:00 +0700 Christian Grothoff <address@hidden> wrote:
> Maybe I missed something, but why should the MHD dependency become 
> _mandatory_? Why not conditionally-compile and run the tests only if MHD 
> is present?

Maybe I just misinterpreting this [1]? What Darshit said about removing old
server code from the codebase will make Wget2 more stable since we will not be
susceptible to bugs in the HTTP Server code. 
So, if it is better options, I will amend my current change, make MHD optional,
give fallback to the old server code if MHD not available.

> MHD does the same for libcurl.  Making the dependency optional also avoids the
> obvious possibility of circular dependencies if we ever were to add
> libwget2-based tests to MHD :-). 

That's our goal too. Make libwget as alternative for libcurl.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]