|Subject:||Re: [libreplanet-discuss] language of prisoner vs liberty software|
|Date:||Mon, 26 Sep 2016 15:45:43 +0000|
On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 09:33:22 -0400
Logan Streondj <email@example.com> wrote:
> Proprietary means it is owned, and held, that it's rights have been
> taken away. Thus it is a prisoner, it can not escape, it can not be
> mixed or copied.
> I suggest we use the term prisoner software in our propaganda, as it
> can be understood in the majority of languages by the majority of
> people .
While I see where you are coming from, I think "prisoner software" has
a bit too much of a negative connotation.
It would imply that the users are prisoners too, which, in a way
they are, but I am not too sure if it does well for the cause.
You could always use "non-free", which carries an idea similar to your
suggestion, while focusing on the freedom part.
() ascii ribbon campaign - against HTML e-mail
/\ - against proprietary attachments
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|