[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 4076 in lilypond: allow bn for B-natural in En

From: lilypond
Subject: Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 4076 in lilypond: allow bn for B-natural in English
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 21:21:39 +0000

Comment #34 on issue 4076 by address@hidden: allow bn for B-natural in English

The point is that the current proposal is worse than the previous one. There is no point in disallowing bn only when the notename language has not been overriden to "abbreviated": if somebody writes explicitly bn, the probability that he rather means bf or bs is pretty much zero.

The only thing "better" with the current patch as compared to the last one is that the user mailing list was not given an opportunity to vote "no" for it.

If any of the two patches would make sense getting in, it would have been the original one, and the vote on that was "no". I don't see the point in making a worse proposal just to get a second chance. If you feel that the original discussion was missing crucial considerations, make another pitch. But adding a separate note language when it only _adds_ new bindings that cannot reasonably be expected to ever be entered in error is not useful.

You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]