[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] Re: #1228 merg

From: Auto mailings of changes to Lily Issues
Subject: [Lilypond-auto] [LilyIssues-auto] [testlilyissues:issues] Re: #1228 merge simultaneous rests of the same duration
Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 16:38:32 +0000

Well, setting stencil #f for superfluous Rests causes other problems, see:

\new Staff \with { \override Rest.stencil = ##f }
<< { r4-. } \ { r4-. } >>

Worth the hassle dealing with it?

[issues:#1228] merge simultaneous rests of the same duration

Status: Started
Created: Wed Aug 18, 2010 11:15 AM UTC by Anonymous
Last Updated: Sun May 21, 2017 10:37 AM UTC
Owner: horndude77

Originally created by: *anonymous

Originally created by: address@hidden

On 11 June 2010 16:27, Xavier Scheuer <address@hidden> wrote:

Could you implement the possibility:
\override RestCollision #'positioning-done = #merge-rests-on-positioning
described in
_directly_ into LilyPond?
So we would not have to define  merge-rests-on-positioning  ourselves,
each time we want to use this function.
This function _is useful_, as shown by the several messages asking for
this on lilypond-user:!&idxname=lilypond-user
That would also be great if you could overpass the limitations, i.e.
– ability to handle more than two voices ;
>– handle multi-measure/whole-measure rests.

Maybe the following discussion could be helpful in a certain way:

Sent from because address@hidden is subscribed to

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.

Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites,!
Testlilyissues-auto mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]