[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: i18n 2nd time
From: |
Juergen Reuter |
Subject: |
Re: i18n 2nd time |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:35:22 +0200 (CEST) |
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > 1. Multiline string literals are valid in Python
>
> -> bugreport to gettext.
>
> > 2. I think that this is one the stupidest C++ decisions I've seen in
> > years.
>
> It's never been valid C, afaik. I've been correcting (ie, removing)
> multi-line strings for quite some time.
>
I don't understand. What's so bad about doing something like:
printf("%d,%d,"
"%d,%d\n",
1, 2, 3, 4);
?
Greetings,
Juergen
- i18n 2nd time, Kopecek Tomas, 2002/06/12
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time,
Juergen Reuter <=
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13
Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13