[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: minor slur problem

From: Edward Sanford Sutton, III
Subject: Re: minor slur problem
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:55:01 -0700
User-agent: KMail/1.6.51

On Wednesday March 24 2004 16:20, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
> > %
> > % This file shows a problem with broken slurs in staves having different
> > % sizes in lilypond CVS 2004-03-23 21:42 MET.
> > %
> > % . The starting point of the continuation of a broken slur is offset
> > %   too far to the left in the smaller staff.
> Why? where do you think it should start?

  I know some other things are restricted to an imaginary line that they 
cannot pass (or so I have heard), such as a resumed melisma should start at 
the end of the key signature. Does something like this apply to slurs? One 
starts before the end of the clef, and the other does not start until 
sometime after the right edge of the clef.
  If I (or these ideas) are wrong for typesetting, I'd like to know that too.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]