[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rfc: basic color support
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: rfc: basic color support |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:04:29 +0100 |
address@hidden writes:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:45:17 +0100, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
> > BTW, I would propose to use a function to abstract the color format
> > for now, ie
> >
> > (define color? list?)
> > (define (rgb r g b) (list r g b))
> I agree. Just a thought: would it be a good idea to only allow just a
> predefined set of colors: b/w, red, green, blue, cyan, magenta etc...
> Users wouldn't notice if we changed the internal representation of
> colors.
>
> (define red '(1.0 0.0 0.0)) (define blue .... etc...
Yes,
please go ahead.
Can you send a patch with all changes collected and a
input/regression/ test?
thanks!
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- rfc: basic color support, Erlend Aasland, 2005/02/16
- rfc: basic color support, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/02/16
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Erlend Aasland, 2005/02/17
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Juergen Reuter, 2005/02/17
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Erlend Aasland, 2005/02/17
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/02/17
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Erlend Aasland, 2005/02/17
- Re: rfc: basic color support,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Erlend Aasland, 2005/02/18
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/02/18
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/02/17
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Erlend Aasland, 2005/02/17
- Re: rfc: basic color support, Erlend Aasland, 2005/02/17