lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hello!


From: Erik Sandberg
Subject: Re: Hello!
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:07:57 +0200
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.7

Citerar Johannes Schindelin <address@hidden>:
> > No, C++ and Java are much the same: statically typed imperative
> prrogramming
> > languages, with support for object orientation.  I think I would use a new
> > project to start learning Haskell or OCaml.
> 
> I´d vote for Haskell.
> 
> Having said that, I am quite comfortable with LilyPond as it is now. While 
> there are quite a few language dependencies (C++, Scheme, Python, 
> PostScript, TeX, and lex/yacc), I think that it runs quite well. Sure, one 
> could try to do away with a few of them (for example, Python and TeX), 

In what way is TeX a language dependency? All I can see, is that lilypond-book
needs to scan and manipulate .tex files (by looking for \include and
\begin{lilypond}), but that script is anyway just a bundled add-on program for
those who already use TeX.

Erik





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]