[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Questions regarding creation of a new glyph

From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: Questions regarding creation of a new glyph
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:44:13 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20061219)

Maximilian Albert escreveu:
> Concerning the naming of the new black diamond glyph I decided to stick
> with "s2harmonic" for the time being because it underlines the
> parallelism to neomensural and the other styles where the black notehead
> is called "s2neomensural", etc. To further keep up this similarity I
> also added a glyph called "s1harmonic" which is entirely identical to
> the open diamond but in a way "closes the gap" between "s0" and "s2"
> (although it is used nowhere at all). IMHO this provides some sort of
> consistency in the naming. Agree?

No, this should be handled by the code in output-lib. That code's sole purpose
is to fill all the gaps in the different styles.

> the compilation process of lilypond (thus indirectly influencing the
> viewing of pdf files). How does it do this?

the command

mftrace --simplify 

uses ff.

I'd like to integrate your patch. However, could you post a patch made with
GIT to the list, so I can apply without having to invent a commit  message
and C&P-ing your name & email? 



Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden -

LilyPond Software Design
 -- Code for Music Notation

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]