[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questions regarding creation of a new glyph
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Questions regarding creation of a new glyph |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:44:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061219) |
Maximilian Albert escreveu:
> Concerning the naming of the new black diamond glyph I decided to stick
> with "s2harmonic" for the time being because it underlines the
> parallelism to neomensural and the other styles where the black notehead
> is called "s2neomensural", etc. To further keep up this similarity I
> also added a glyph called "s1harmonic" which is entirely identical to
> the open diamond but in a way "closes the gap" between "s0" and "s2"
> (although it is used nowhere at all). IMHO this provides some sort of
> consistency in the naming. Agree?
No, this should be handled by the code in output-lib. That code's sole purpose
is to fill all the gaps in the different styles.
> the compilation process of lilypond (thus indirectly influencing the
> viewing of pdf files). How does it do this?
the command
mftrace --simplify
uses ff.
I'd like to integrate your patch. However, could you post a patch made with
GIT to the list, so I can apply without having to invent a commit message
and C&P-ing your name & email?
thanks.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
Re: Questions regarding creation of a new glyph (was: White diamond, black diamond, and possible small sponsorship?), Orm Finnendahl, 2007/01/27
Re: Questions regarding creation of a new glyph, Maximilian Albert, 2007/01/29