[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Docs - unfretted strings

From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: Docs - unfretted strings
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 03:48:31 -0700

On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 11:35:36 +0100
"Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> wrote:

> I just got round to looking at Unfretted strings in the Notation
> Reference, and I'm not very happy with this subdivision.

1.  It makes a nice contrast with "fretted strings".
2.  There's almost no content in that section anyway.
3.  I can only imagine about two pages of content for bowed
strings, anyway (e.g., artificial harmonics, and... and... well,
that's pretty much it)

If we might possibly have more than two pages for Bowed strings,
I'd be more inclined to give it its own section.  But really, all
I can imagine at the moment is one paragraph + example, plus
references to NR 1.

> This would mean splitting unfretted.itely into two files.
> Would this give you any problems at this late stage?

No.  The bigger problem is adding another LSR tag, making sure to
tag at least one snippet with it so doesn't break, etc.
Not that it's a "big" problem; it'll be about 1 hour of work split
between those involved.

- Graham

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]