[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fw: Vocal music
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: Fw: Vocal music |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:41:10 +0200 |
2008/10/13 Trevor Daniels <address@hidden>:
> That's because you've put all the different style stuff
> where it doesn't belong, in "Common notation". "Common
> notation" should contain _only_ things which are used
> in _all_ the styles. "Common" here means "belonging
> equally to all", not its other meaning of "appearing
> frequently, familar". So anything that is style-specific
> should not be there, hence there should be no headings
> like "Opera" in "Common". Take these out and put them
> back in a "Specific styles" section, as we agreed
> earlier, and I'll be happy.
Yes, but this 'specific styles' section (hehe, I can't wait to see
Graham's face when he'll read this title) will look *very much* like a
"References for vocal music" section, since it will mostly contain
@ref to external sections and not genuine doc material: e.g. in
"Spoken music" subsection I'll have to @ref to "Note heads", in "Song
books" I'll have to @ref to "Chord notation", etc.
Second problem: _the_ "References for vocal music" in "Common
notation" will actually not reference every external section there's
to see about vocal music: e.g. it will not include "Note heads" since
this will already explained in detail in "Specific styles".
Third problem: if I put all style-specific stuff in a separate
section, there's no longer enough material remaining to have both
"References for vocal music" and "References for lyrics", as I
suggested previously, which is why I merged these two in a "References
for vocal music and lyrics" subsection. *But* then, is it really
relevant to have a "Common notation" section at all? (since the @ref
for lyrics will mostly link inside NR2.1 anyway)
I was quite happy with the layout we agreed upon, but I could hardly
fill these subsections in "Common notation".
Suggestion: instead of "Opera" and such, that clearly do not belong in
a "Common notation section", we could name these subsections
"References for opera engraving", "References for song books", etc;
would this help?
Cheers,
Valentin
- Re: Fw: Vocal music, (continued)
- Re: Fw: Vocal music, Francisco Vila, 2008/10/02
- Re: Fw: Vocal music, Valentin Villenave, 2008/10/02
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Fw: Vocal music, Trevor Daniels, 2008/10/02
- Re: Fw: Vocal music, Valentin Villenave, 2008/10/03
- Re: Fw: Vocal music, Trevor Daniels, 2008/10/03
- Re: Fw: Vocal music, Valentin Villenave, 2008/10/12
- Re: Fw: Vocal music, Trevor Daniels, 2008/10/13
- Re: Fw: Vocal music, Eyolf Ă˜strem, 2008/10/13
- Re: Fw: Vocal music, Trevor Daniels, 2008/10/13
- Re: Fw: Vocal music, Graham Percival, 2008/10/13
- Re: Fw: Vocal music,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: Fw: Vocal music, Trevor Daniels, 2008/10/13