|
From: | Till Rettig |
Subject: | Re: Patch for stylesheets |
Date: | Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:02:44 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081125) |
Patrick McCarty schrieb:
Yes it's true about readability, but what if there would be stille some blue 'in between'. Maybe it is only my lcd screen?I have considered keeping the soft blue for the links, but here are my two main reasons for changing to the more "pure" blue: - The current blue (#3465a4) does not pass the WCAG 1.0 against a white background. Based on experience, the new blue definitely increases readability, even though the current "soft blue" might be a *nicer* color. Since LilyPond's documentation is so extensive, I think the increase in readability is a plus.
what if they would be underlined in the text? One could argue that if the user want's to switch it off he can distinguish also more subtle contrasts...- With the current soft blue, it is difficult to distinguish *links* from *black text* if link underlining is turned off in the browser. Since the new blue is more contrasting with the black text in div#main, this would no longer be an issue.
till
I want to use the softer blue for something else besides text, but I haven't yet decided where to put it, thus its absence from this patch. Thanks for your comments, -Patrick
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |