[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Jun 2009 09:12:35 +0200 |
Op zondag 31-05-2009 om 22:49 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
> Anybody else? Particularly on ubuntu systems?
FWIW, I'm doing GUB builds on ubuntu.
> None of the other places I put -fno-stack-protector had any
> effect, so I was just trying everything. :(
Yeah, I know that mode. Sometimes it works, but what always
helps best is to really look what's going on.
> No change; still the same error message. I also tried adding a
> similar section to gub/specs/darwin/gcc.py (changing it to
> return (gcc.Gcc.configure_command...
> but it still failed.
For example, it looks to me from the log as if RANLIB fails
with a stack overflow problem. First, make sure if this is the ranlib
from odcctools and not the ranlib on your system (eg, /usr/bin/ranlib).
Then, make sure -fno-stack-protector is added to the ranlib compile
(and -fno-stack-protector is actually the right switch -- google
may help).
> I'm really surprised that gcc would be the finicky; I would have
> thought that a compiler would be as easy to compile as possible,
> and the people working on gcc should have more experience with
> compiling than anybody else in the world. :)
No, as it stands, Han-Wen and I have the most cross build experience
in the world ;-) Pretty soon now, you're also on that list. Even
openSUSE/openoffice.org is looking at GUB now :-)
Greetings,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
AvatarĀ®: http://AvatarAcademy.nl | http://lilypond.org
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/01
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <=
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/02
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Graham Percival, 2009/06/03
- Re: GUB on kainhofer: still cross/gcc, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/03