[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New format for autobeaming rules
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: New format for autobeaming rules |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jul 2009 19:35:02 -0600 |
On 7/12/09 11:13 AM, "address@hidden" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/43/1045
> File
> input/lsr/automatic-beams-two-per-two-in-4-4-or-2-2-time-signature.ly
> (right):
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/88155/diff/43/1045#newcode1
> Line 1: %% Do not edit this file; it is auto-generated from input/new
> If you're keeping the revised rule for 4/4, this file's obsolete (it's
> already been unticked in LSR for docs).
>
> The changes you've made contradict the original intent of this snippet
> (and the title's incorrect), so it would be better to have a new snippet
> for this.
>
> Frankly, I'd much prefer returning to the old settings (also for 3/4);
> not only are they more in keeping with LilyPond's declared aims with
> regard to typesetting style, they also produce better looking examples
> in the documentation.
>
I've returned the default grouping to (2 2) for 4/4. We still don't need
this snippet; there's an example in the docs that demonstrates this.
I've eliminated this snippet.
Thanks,
Carl
- New format for autobeaming rules, n . puttock, 2009/07/12
- Re: New format for autobeaming rules, n . puttock, 2009/07/14
- Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Carl Sorensen, 2009/07/15
- Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Neil Puttock, 2009/07/15
- Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Graham Percival, 2009/07/17
- PATCH: Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Carl Sorensen, 2009/07/21
- Re: PATCH: Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Patrick McCarty, 2009/07/21
- Re: PATCH: Re: New format for autobeaming rules, Patrick McCarty, 2009/07/21
Re: New format for autobeaming rules, n . puttock, 2009/07/15