[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Broken make
From: |
Matthias Kilian |
Subject: |
Re: Broken make |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:34:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 09:32:16AM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> > Just drop it. If the destination file has to be updated whenever
> > the source file changes, let make(1) handle it.
>
> I dropped it in my local copy, and make succeeded. But I have not pushed
> the change to git, and won't. I don't have enough confidence that I know
> the build process well to be sure I'm not breaking something. I'll let John
> Mandereau get to it when he has the time.
Yep, it may be helpful to know *what* he was trying to fix with cp -u.
Ciao,
Kili
--
Automake and autoconf deserve to wither and die, but unfortunately noone
at GNU seems to make much of an effort to euthanasize them.
-- Han-Wen Nienhuys, on Lilypond-devel mailing list
Re: Broken make, Trevor Daniels, 2009/07/14