[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LilyPond concept glossary?
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: LilyPond concept glossary? |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Aug 2009 13:21:09 +0200 |
2009/7/31 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> IMO this is more "main NR chapter" material. Appendices are
> generally tables and auto-generated material. I could imagine NR
> 6 being pretty much what it is right now -- essentially just
> simply substitution macros -- and a NR 7 being for advanced
> scheme. (I mean, not \textPad #3.0 stuff, but for the amazingly
> complex stuff that Mark's always doing)
I hardly think this has anything to do with *notation* per se, i.e.
_nobody_ ever needs to know what a smob is in order to engrave a
score.
A few days ago we discussed the possibility of having an appendix to
the CG, and I think this is where such material would belong.
Regards,
Valentin
- Re: LilyPond concept glossary?,
Valentin Villenave <=