[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LilyPond concept glossary?

From: Valentin Villenave
Subject: Re: LilyPond concept glossary?
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 13:21:09 +0200

2009/7/31 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> IMO this is more "main NR chapter" material.  Appendices are
> generally tables and auto-generated material.  I could imagine NR
> 6 being pretty much what it is right now -- essentially just
> simply substitution macros -- and a NR 7 being for advanced
> scheme.  (I mean, not \textPad #3.0 stuff, but for the amazingly
> complex stuff that Mark's always doing)

I hardly think this has anything to do with *notation* per se, i.e.
_nobody_ ever needs to know what a smob is in order to engrave a

A few days ago we discussed the possibility of having an appendix to
the CG, and I think this is where such material would belong.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]