[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Broken refs

From: Graham Percival
Subject: Re: Broken refs
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:41:56 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 03:29:11PM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Le jeudi 06 août 2009 à 13:51 +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer a écrit :
> > No, big pages should link to the other big pages. That's how the current 
> > .init 
> > file is supposed to work. If it doesn' t, then that' s a bug in the script 
> > and 
> > needs to be fixed.
> But does the web site in one large page makes sense?

general.texi is a manual.  It happens to be the first manual that
people should read, but IMO it's still a manual.  My opinion is
that we should still produce one large page for this, but I'm not
too concerned either way.

> > Why one large file? I thought it should be one large file per manual, with 
> > the 
> > xrefs going between those large files.
> You think right, IIUC Graham and I never meant anything else.

Yes -- possibly the confusion arose from "general.html", by which
I meant "the one large file for the manual produced by
general.texi", rather than "the one large file that is generally
everything".  :)

> > Or am I misunderstanding what is being said?
> You 're right in theory, but from a practical point of view, current
> web-texi2html.init makes big page without navigation bars,

Sounds fine to me.  I suggest that we just go with this and add
the @rgeneral links.  If somebody wants to hack stuff to get
navbars in the large page at a later date, they can do that.

- Graham

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]